Central African Republic vs Thailand: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Central African Republic
0.0231 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Thailand
0.0237 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Central African Republic rank
122nd
Thailand rank
120th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Thailand
00.020.040.06196119922023

How they compare

Thailand currently reports 0.0237 t per square kilometre against 0.0231 t per square kilometre in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.0006 t per square kilometre.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Thailand has been ahead every year.

Central African Republic ranks 122nd and Thailand ranks 120th of 167 countries.

Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Thailand Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0023 t per square kilometre 0.0156 t per square kilometre 0.0133 t per square kilometre Thailand
1970s 0.004 t per square kilometre 0.0229 t per square kilometre 0.0189 t per square kilometre Thailand
1980s 0.0068 t per square kilometre 0.0304 t per square kilometre 0.0236 t per square kilometre Thailand
1990s 0.0108 t per square kilometre 0.0442 t per square kilometre 0.0334 t per square kilometre Thailand
2000s 0.0168 t per square kilometre 0.025 t per square kilometre 0.0083 t per square kilometre Thailand
2010s 0.0209 t per square kilometre 0.0285 t per square kilometre 0.0075 t per square kilometre Thailand
2020s 0.0229 t per square kilometre 0.0251 t per square kilometre 0.0022 t per square kilometre Thailand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Central African Republic or Thailand?
Thailand, at 0.0237 t per square kilometre against 0.0231 t per square kilometre in Central African Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Central African Republic and Thailand?
0.0006 t per square kilometre, with Thailand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Thailand?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Central African Republic and Thailand rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Central African Republic ranks 122nd and Thailand ranks 120th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Thailand: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/thailand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/thailand/">Central African Republic vs Thailand: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.