Cameroon vs India: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Cameroon
0.0461 t per square kilometre
in 2023
India
0.0449 t per square kilometre
in 1990
Cameroon rank
99th
India rank
100th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Cameroon
  • India
0.010.020.030.040.05196119922023

How they compare

Cameroon currently reports 0.0461 t per square kilometre against 0.0449 t per square kilometre in India, a difference of 0.0012 t per square kilometre.

Across all 30 years both countries report, India has been ahead every year.

Cameroon ranks 99th and India ranks 100th of 167 countries.

India has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cameroon India Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0085 t per square kilometre 0.0234 t per square kilometre 0.0149 t per square kilometre India
1970s 0.0141 t per square kilometre 0.0302 t per square kilometre 0.016 t per square kilometre India
1980s 0.0196 t per square kilometre 0.0405 t per square kilometre 0.0208 t per square kilometre India
1990s 0.0256 t per square kilometre 0.0449 t per square kilometre 0.0193 t per square kilometre India

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Cameroon or India?
Cameroon, at 0.0461 t per square kilometre against 0.0449 t per square kilometre in India as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Cameroon and India?
0.0012 t per square kilometre, with Cameroon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and India?
30 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1990.
How do Cameroon and India rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Cameroon ranks 99th and India ranks 100th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cameroon vs India: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/cameroon/india/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/cameroon/india/">Cameroon vs India: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.