Burkina Faso vs Mauritius: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Burkina Faso
0.0831 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius
0.0803 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Burkina Faso rank
69th
Mauritius rank
70th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Mauritius
00.050.10.150.2196119922023

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports 0.0831 t per square kilometre against 0.0803 t per square kilometre in Mauritius, a difference of 0.0028 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritius ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 69th and Mauritius ranks 70th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 1 and Mauritius in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Mauritius Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0126 t per square kilometre 0.0814 t per square kilometre 0.0688 t per square kilometre Mauritius
1970s 0.0136 t per square kilometre 0.0986 t per square kilometre 0.085 t per square kilometre Mauritius
1980s 0.0188 t per square kilometre 0.0542 t per square kilometre 0.0354 t per square kilometre Mauritius
1990s 0.0389 t per square kilometre 0.1004 t per square kilometre 0.0615 t per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 0.063 t per square kilometre 0.1049 t per square kilometre 0.0419 t per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 0.0705 t per square kilometre 0.0845 t per square kilometre 0.014 t per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 0.0803 t per square kilometre 0.0761 t per square kilometre 0.0042 t per square kilometre Burkina Faso

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Burkina Faso or Mauritius?
Burkina Faso, at 0.0831 t per square kilometre against 0.0803 t per square kilometre in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Burkina Faso and Mauritius?
0.0028 t per square kilometre, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Mauritius?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Burkina Faso and Mauritius rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Burkina Faso ranks 69th and Mauritius ranks 70th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Mauritius: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/mauritius/">Burkina Faso vs Mauritius: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.