Botswana vs Sweden: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Botswana
0.0166 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Sweden
0.0174 t per square kilometre
in 2017
Botswana rank
132nd
Sweden rank
130th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Botswana
  • Sweden
00.010.020.03196119922023

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 0.0174 t per square kilometre against 0.0166 t per square kilometre in Botswana, a difference of 0.0008 t per square kilometre.

That makes Sweden's figure about 1.1 times Botswana's.

Across all 57 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.

Botswana ranks 132nd and Sweden ranks 130th of 167 countries.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Sweden Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0053 t per square kilometre 0.023 t per square kilometre 0.0177 t per square kilometre Sweden
1970s 0.009 t per square kilometre 0.0225 t per square kilometre 0.0135 t per square kilometre Sweden
1980s 0.0098 t per square kilometre 0.0202 t per square kilometre 0.0103 t per square kilometre Sweden
1990s 0.0099 t per square kilometre 0.0184 t per square kilometre 0.0084 t per square kilometre Sweden
2000s 0.0081 t per square kilometre 0.0184 t per square kilometre 0.0104 t per square kilometre Sweden
2010s 0.0124 t per square kilometre 0.0176 t per square kilometre 0.0052 t per square kilometre Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Botswana or Sweden?
Sweden, at 0.0174 t per square kilometre against 0.0166 t per square kilometre in Botswana as of 2017.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Botswana and Sweden?
0.0008 t per square kilometre, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Sweden?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Botswana and Sweden rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Botswana ranks 132nd and Sweden ranks 130th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Sweden: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/botswana/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/botswana/sweden/">Botswana vs Sweden: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.