Botswana vs North Macedonia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Botswana
0.0166 t per square kilometre
in 2023
North Macedonia
0.0142 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
132nd
North Macedonia rank
135th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Botswana
  • North Macedonia
00.010.020.03196119922023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 0.0166 t per square kilometre against 0.0142 t per square kilometre in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.0024 t per square kilometre.

That makes Botswana's figure about 1.2 times North Macedonia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was North Macedonia ahead.

Botswana ranks 132nd and North Macedonia ranks 135th of 167 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and North Macedonia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana North Macedonia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0098 t per square kilometre 0.0249 t per square kilometre 0.0151 t per square kilometre North Macedonia
2000s 0.0081 t per square kilometre 0.0258 t per square kilometre 0.0177 t per square kilometre North Macedonia
2010s 0.0128 t per square kilometre 0.0177 t per square kilometre 0.005 t per square kilometre North Macedonia
2020s 0.0167 t per square kilometre 0.0146 t per square kilometre 0.0021 t per square kilometre Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Botswana or North Macedonia?
Botswana, at 0.0166 t per square kilometre against 0.0142 t per square kilometre in North Macedonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Botswana and North Macedonia?
0.0024 t per square kilometre, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and North Macedonia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Botswana and North Macedonia rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Botswana ranks 132nd and North Macedonia ranks 135th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs North Macedonia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/botswana/north-macedonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/botswana/north-macedonia/">Botswana vs North Macedonia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.