Belgium vs New Zealand: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Belgium
0.825 t per square kilometre
in 2017
New Zealand
0.6218 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Belgium rank
3rd
New Zealand rank
4th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Belgium
  • New Zealand
0.20.40.60.8196119922023

How they compare

Belgium currently reports 0.825 t per square kilometre against 0.6218 t per square kilometre in New Zealand, a difference of 0.2032 t per square kilometre.

That makes Belgium's figure about 1.3 times New Zealand's.

Across all 18 years both countries report, Belgium has been ahead every year.

Belgium ranks 3rd and New Zealand ranks 4th of 167 countries.

Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium New Zealand Difference Ahead
2000s 0.8238 t per square kilometre 0.5263 t per square kilometre 0.2975 t per square kilometre Belgium
2010s 0.7881 t per square kilometre 0.5333 t per square kilometre 0.2548 t per square kilometre Belgium

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Belgium or New Zealand?
Belgium, at 0.825 t per square kilometre against 0.6218 t per square kilometre in New Zealand as of 2017.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Belgium and New Zealand?
0.2032 t per square kilometre, with Belgium ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and New Zealand?
18 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2017.
How do Belgium and New Zealand rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Belgium ranks 3rd and New Zealand ranks 4th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs New Zealand: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/belgium/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/belgium/new-zealand/">Belgium vs New Zealand: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.