Belgium vs Israel: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Belgium
0.825 t per square kilometre
in 2017
Israel
1.22 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Belgium rank
3rd
Israel rank
2nd

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Belgium
  • Israel
00.250.50.7511.2196119922023

How they compare

Israel currently reports 1.22 t per square kilometre against 0.825 t per square kilometre in Belgium, a difference of 0.395 t per square kilometre.

That makes Israel's figure about 1.5 times Belgium's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.

Belgium ranks 3rd and Israel ranks 2nd of 167 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Israel in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Israel Difference Ahead
2000s 0.8238 t per square kilometre 0.6777 t per square kilometre 0.146 t per square kilometre Belgium
2010s 0.7881 t per square kilometre 0.9331 t per square kilometre 0.145 t per square kilometre Israel

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Belgium or Israel?
Israel, at 1.22 t per square kilometre against 0.825 t per square kilometre in Belgium as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Belgium and Israel?
0.395 t per square kilometre, with Israel ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Israel?
18 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2017.
How do Belgium and Israel rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Belgium ranks 3rd and Israel ranks 2nd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Israel: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/belgium/israel/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/belgium/israel/">Belgium vs Israel: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.