Belarus vs Rwanda: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Belarus
0.3239 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
0.318 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
17th
Rwanda rank
19th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Belarus
  • Rwanda
00.10.20.30.4196119922023

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 0.3239 t per square kilometre against 0.318 t per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0059 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 17th and Rwanda ranks 19th of 167 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 3 and Rwanda in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Rwanda Difference Ahead
1990s 0.2887 t per square kilometre 0.1055 t per square kilometre 0.1832 t per square kilometre Belarus
2000s 0.2148 t per square kilometre 0.2099 t per square kilometre 0.0049 t per square kilometre Belarus
2010s 0.2721 t per square kilometre 0.2547 t per square kilometre 0.0174 t per square kilometre Belarus
2020s 0.3041 t per square kilometre 0.3209 t per square kilometre 0.0168 t per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Belarus or Rwanda?
Belarus, at 0.3239 t per square kilometre against 0.318 t per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Belarus and Rwanda?
0.0059 t per square kilometre, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Rwanda?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Rwanda rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Belarus ranks 17th and Rwanda ranks 19th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Rwanda: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/belarus/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/belarus/rwanda/">Belarus vs Rwanda: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.