Belarus vs Malta: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Belarus
0.3239 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta
0.3491 t per square kilometre
in 2017
Belarus rank
17th
Malta rank
14th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Belarus
  • Malta
0.20.40.60.81196119922023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 0.3491 t per square kilometre against 0.3239 t per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 0.0252 t per square kilometre.

That makes Malta's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 17th and Malta ranks 14th of 167 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Malta Difference Ahead
1990s 0.2887 t per square kilometre 0.5185 t per square kilometre 0.2298 t per square kilometre Malta
2000s 0.2148 t per square kilometre 0.4586 t per square kilometre 0.2438 t per square kilometre Malta
2010s 0.2695 t per square kilometre 0.3603 t per square kilometre 0.0909 t per square kilometre Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Belarus or Malta?
Malta, at 0.3491 t per square kilometre against 0.3239 t per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2017.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Belarus and Malta?
0.0252 t per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Malta?
26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.
How do Belarus and Malta rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Belarus ranks 17th and Malta ranks 14th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Malta: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/belarus/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/belarus/malta/">Belarus vs Malta: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.