Belarus vs Luxembourg: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Belarus
0.3239 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Luxembourg
0.3329 t per square kilometre
in 2017
Belarus rank
17th
Luxembourg rank
15th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Belarus
  • Luxembourg
00.10.20.30.4199220072023

How they compare

Luxembourg currently reports 0.3329 t per square kilometre against 0.3239 t per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 0.009 t per square kilometre.

Across all 18 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 17th and Luxembourg ranks 15th of 167 countries.

Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Luxembourg Difference Ahead
2000s 0.2148 t per square kilometre 0.3402 t per square kilometre 0.1254 t per square kilometre Luxembourg
2010s 0.2695 t per square kilometre 0.3109 t per square kilometre 0.0415 t per square kilometre Luxembourg

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Belarus or Luxembourg?
Luxembourg, at 0.3329 t per square kilometre against 0.3239 t per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2017.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Belarus and Luxembourg?
0.009 t per square kilometre, with Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Luxembourg?
18 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2017.
How do Belarus and Luxembourg rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Belarus ranks 17th and Luxembourg ranks 15th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Luxembourg: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/belarus/luxembourg/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/belarus/luxembourg/">Belarus vs Luxembourg: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.