Barbados vs Gambia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Barbados
0.0471 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Gambia
0.0481 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
94th
Gambia rank
93rd

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Barbados
  • Gambia
0.050.10.150.20.250.3196119922023

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 0.0481 t per square kilometre against 0.0471 t per square kilometre in Barbados, a difference of 0.001 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 94th and Gambia ranks 93rd of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 6 and Gambia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Gambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1089 t per square kilometre 0.0531 t per square kilometre 0.0557 t per square kilometre Barbados
1970s 0.101 t per square kilometre 0.0689 t per square kilometre 0.0321 t per square kilometre Barbados
1980s 0.1121 t per square kilometre 0.0579 t per square kilometre 0.0541 t per square kilometre Barbados
1990s 0.2288 t per square kilometre 0.0628 t per square kilometre 0.166 t per square kilometre Barbados
2000s 0.086 t per square kilometre 0.0711 t per square kilometre 0.0149 t per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 0.0453 t per square kilometre 0.0711 t per square kilometre 0.0258 t per square kilometre Gambia
2020s 0.0497 t per square kilometre 0.046 t per square kilometre 0.0037 t per square kilometre Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Barbados or Gambia?
Gambia, at 0.0481 t per square kilometre against 0.0471 t per square kilometre in Barbados as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Barbados and Gambia?
0.001 t per square kilometre, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Gambia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Gambia rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Barbados ranks 94th and Gambia ranks 93rd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Gambia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/barbados/gambia-the/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/barbados/gambia-the/">Barbados vs Gambia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.