Argentina vs Guatemala: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Argentina
0.2044 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala
0.1913 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Argentina rank
30th
Guatemala rank
32nd

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Argentina
  • Guatemala
0.050.10.150.2196119922023

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 0.2044 t per square kilometre against 0.1913 t per square kilometre in Guatemala, a difference of 0.0131 t per square kilometre.

That makes Argentina's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Argentina ahead.

Argentina ranks 30th and Guatemala ranks 32nd of 167 countries.

Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Guatemala Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1481 t per square kilometre 0.0422 t per square kilometre 0.1059 t per square kilometre Argentina
1970s 0.1586 t per square kilometre 0.0577 t per square kilometre 0.1009 t per square kilometre Argentina
1980s 0.167 t per square kilometre 0.0477 t per square kilometre 0.1193 t per square kilometre Argentina
1990s 0.1716 t per square kilometre 0.0502 t per square kilometre 0.1214 t per square kilometre Argentina
2000s 0.1819 t per square kilometre 0.0632 t per square kilometre 0.1187 t per square kilometre Argentina
2010s 0.1719 t per square kilometre 0.1596 t per square kilometre 0.0123 t per square kilometre Argentina
2020s 0.1957 t per square kilometre 0.1885 t per square kilometre 0.0072 t per square kilometre Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Argentina or Guatemala?
Argentina, at 0.2044 t per square kilometre against 0.1913 t per square kilometre in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Argentina and Guatemala?
0.0131 t per square kilometre, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Guatemala?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Argentina and Guatemala rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Argentina ranks 30th and Guatemala ranks 32nd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Guatemala: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/argentina/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/argentina/guatemala/">Argentina vs Guatemala: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.