Angola vs North Macedonia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Angola
0.0136 t per square kilometre
in 2023
North Macedonia
0.0142 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Angola rank
136th
North Macedonia rank
135th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Angola
  • North Macedonia
00.010.020.03196119922023

How they compare

North Macedonia currently reports 0.0142 t per square kilometre against 0.0136 t per square kilometre in Angola, a difference of 0.0006 t per square kilometre.

Across all 32 years both countries report, North Macedonia has been ahead every year.

Angola ranks 136th and North Macedonia ranks 135th of 167 countries.

North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola North Macedonia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0092 t per square kilometre 0.0249 t per square kilometre 0.0157 t per square kilometre North Macedonia
2000s 0.0117 t per square kilometre 0.0258 t per square kilometre 0.0141 t per square kilometre North Macedonia
2010s 0.0132 t per square kilometre 0.0177 t per square kilometre 0.0045 t per square kilometre North Macedonia
2020s 0.0132 t per square kilometre 0.0146 t per square kilometre 0.0014 t per square kilometre North Macedonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Angola or North Macedonia?
North Macedonia, at 0.0142 t per square kilometre against 0.0136 t per square kilometre in Angola as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Angola and North Macedonia?
0.0006 t per square kilometre, with North Macedonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and North Macedonia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Angola and North Macedonia rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Angola ranks 136th and North Macedonia ranks 135th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs North Macedonia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/angola/north-macedonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/angola/north-macedonia/">Angola vs North Macedonia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.