Sierra Leone vs Palestine: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Sierra Leone
0.0004 t per person
in 2024
Palestine
0.0004 t per person
in 2022
Sierra Leone rank
112th
Palestine rank
109th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Sierra Leone
  • Palestine
000.0010.001196119922024

How they compare

Palestine currently reports 0.0004 t per person against 0.0004 t per person in Sierra Leone, a difference of 0 t per person.

That makes Palestine's figure about 1.1 times Sierra Leone's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Palestine ahead.

Sierra Leone ranks 112th and Palestine ranks 109th of 167 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Sierra Leone averaged higher in 1 and Palestine in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sierra Leone Palestine Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0003 t per person 0.0007 t per person 0.0003 t per person Palestine
2000s 0.0002 t per person 0.0003 t per person 0.0001 t per person Palestine
2010s 0.0004 t per person 0.0003 t per person 0.0001 t per person Sierra Leone
2020s 0.0004 t per person 0.0004 t per person 0 t per person Palestine

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Sierra Leone or Palestine?
Palestine, at 0.0004 t per person against 0.0004 t per person in Sierra Leone as of 2022.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Sierra Leone and Palestine?
0 t per person, with Palestine ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sierra Leone and Palestine?
29 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2022.
How do Sierra Leone and Palestine rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Sierra Leone ranks 112th and Palestine ranks 109th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sierra Leone vs Palestine: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-capita/sierra-leone/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-capita/sierra-leone/west-bank-and-gaza/">Sierra Leone vs Palestine: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita
Unit
t per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,536 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.