Rwanda vs Tonga: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Rwanda
0.0006 t per person
in 2024
Tonga
0.0006 t per person
in 2024
Rwanda rank
96th
Tonga rank
97th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Rwanda
  • Tonga
000.0010.0010.0010.001196119922024

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 0.0006 t per person against 0.0006 t per person in Tonga, a difference of 0 t per person.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Rwanda ahead.

Rwanda ranks 96th and Tonga ranks 97th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 3 and Tonga in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Tonga Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0003 t per person 0.0002 t per person 0.0002 t per person Rwanda
1970s 0.0004 t per person 0.0002 t per person 0.0002 t per person Rwanda
1980s 0.0004 t per person 0.0005 t per person 0 t per person Tonga
1990s 0.0004 t per person 0.0006 t per person 0.0002 t per person Tonga
2000s 0.0006 t per person 0.0006 t per person 0 t per person Tonga
2010s 0.0005 t per person 0.0006 t per person 0 t per person Tonga
2020s 0.0006 t per person 0.0006 t per person 0 t per person Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Rwanda or Tonga?
Rwanda, at 0.0006 t per person against 0.0006 t per person in Tonga as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Rwanda and Tonga?
0 t per person, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Tonga?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Rwanda and Tonga rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Rwanda ranks 96th and Tonga ranks 97th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Tonga: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-capita/rwanda/tonga/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-capita/rwanda/tonga/">Rwanda vs Tonga: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita
Unit
t per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,536 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.