Romania vs Zambia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Romania
0.0015 t per person
in 2017
Zambia
0.0017 t per person
in 2024
Romania rank
49th
Zambia rank
48th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Romania
  • Zambia
0.0010.0020.0030.004196119922024

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0.0017 t per person against 0.0015 t per person in Romania, a difference of 0.0002 t per person.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Romania's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Romania ahead.

Romania ranks 49th and Zambia ranks 48th of 167 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Romania averaged higher in 5 and Zambia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Romania Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0025 t per person 0.0011 t per person 0.0014 t per person Romania
1970s 0.0032 t per person 0.0009 t per person 0.0023 t per person Romania
1980s 0.0027 t per person 0.0008 t per person 0.0019 t per person Romania
1990s 0.0026 t per person 0.001 t per person 0.0017 t per person Romania
2000s 0.002 t per person 0.0009 t per person 0.0011 t per person Romania
2010s 0.0016 t per person 0.0018 t per person 0.0002 t per person Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Romania or Zambia?
Zambia, at 0.0017 t per person against 0.0015 t per person in Romania as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Romania and Zambia?
0.0002 t per person, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Zambia?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Romania and Zambia rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Romania ranks 49th and Zambia ranks 48th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Romania vs Zambia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-capita/romania/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-capita/romania/zambia/">Romania vs Zambia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita
Unit
t per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,536 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.