Papua New Guinea vs Qatar: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Papua New Guinea
0 t per person
in 2024
Qatar
0.0001 t per person
in 2024
Papua New Guinea rank
162nd
Qatar rank
160th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Qatar
000000.001196119922024

How they compare

Qatar currently reports 0.0001 t per person against 0 t per person in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.0001 t per person.

That makes Qatar's figure about 1.8 times Papua New Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Qatar ahead.

Papua New Guinea ranks 162nd and Qatar ranks 160th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Papua New Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Qatar in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Qatar Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0001 t per person 0.0004 t per person 0.0003 t per person Qatar
1970s 0.0001 t per person 0.0002 t per person 0 t per person Qatar
1980s 0.0001 t per person 0.0001 t per person 0 t per person Papua New Guinea
1990s 0.0001 t per person 0.0001 t per person 0 t per person Qatar
2000s 0.0001 t per person 0.0001 t per person 0 t per person Qatar
2010s 0.0001 t per person 0.0001 t per person 0 t per person Qatar
2020s 0 t per person 0.0001 t per person 0 t per person Qatar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Papua New Guinea or Qatar?
Qatar, at 0.0001 t per person against 0 t per person in Papua New Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Papua New Guinea and Qatar?
0.0001 t per person, with Qatar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Qatar?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Papua New Guinea and Qatar rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Papua New Guinea ranks 162nd and Qatar ranks 160th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs Qatar: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-capita/papua-new-guinea/qatar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-capita/papua-new-guinea/qatar/">Papua New Guinea vs Qatar: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita
Unit
t per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,536 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.