Namibia vs New Caledonia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Namibia
0.0013 t per person
in 2024
New Caledonia
0.0014 t per person
in 2024
Namibia rank
55th
New Caledonia rank
53rd

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Namibia
  • New Caledonia
0.0010.0020.0030.0040.0050.006196119922024

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 0.0014 t per person against 0.0013 t per person in Namibia, a difference of 0.0001 t per person.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Caledonia ahead.

Namibia ranks 55th and New Caledonia ranks 53rd of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 5 and New Caledonia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0037 t per person 0.0046 t per person 0.0009 t per person New Caledonia
1970s 0.0041 t per person 0.003 t per person 0.0011 t per person Namibia
1980s 0.0037 t per person 0.0022 t per person 0.0015 t per person Namibia
1990s 0.0032 t per person 0.0025 t per person 0.0006 t per person Namibia
2000s 0.0026 t per person 0.002 t per person 0.0006 t per person Namibia
2010s 0.0017 t per person 0.0016 t per person 0.0001 t per person Namibia
2020s 0.0012 t per person 0.0014 t per person 0.0002 t per person New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Namibia or New Caledonia?
New Caledonia, at 0.0014 t per person against 0.0013 t per person in Namibia as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Namibia and New Caledonia?
0.0001 t per person, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and New Caledonia?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Namibia and New Caledonia rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Namibia ranks 55th and New Caledonia ranks 53rd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs New Caledonia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-capita/namibia/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-capita/namibia/new-caledonia/">Namibia vs New Caledonia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita
Unit
t per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,536 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.