Latvia vs New Caledonia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per
Latvia
0.0014 t per person
in 2017
New Caledonia
0.0014 t per person
in 2024
Latvia rank
52nd
New Caledonia rank
53rd
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time
- Latvia
- New Caledonia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0.0014 t per person against 0.0014 t per person in New Caledonia, a difference of 0 t per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 52nd and New Caledonia ranks 53rd of 167 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and New Caledonia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0032 t per person | 0.0026 t per person | 0.0006 t per person | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0.0014 t per person | 0.002 t per person | 0.0007 t per person | New Caledonia |
| 2010s | 0.0013 t per person | 0.0016 t per person | 0.0003 t per person | New Caledonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Latvia or New Caledonia?
- Latvia, at 0.0014 t per person against 0.0014 t per person in New Caledonia as of 2017.
- What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Latvia and New Caledonia?
- 0 t per person, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and New Caledonia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.
- How do Latvia and New Caledonia rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
- Latvia ranks 52nd and New Caledonia ranks 53rd of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.