Indonesia vs Suriname: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Indonesia
0.0003 t per person
in 2024
Suriname
0.0003 t per person
in 2024
Indonesia rank
119th
Suriname rank
118th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Indonesia
  • Suriname
000.0010.0010.001196119922024

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 0.0003 t per person against 0.0003 t per person in Indonesia, a difference of 0 t per person.

That makes Suriname's figure about 1.1 times Indonesia's.

Across all 64 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.

Indonesia ranks 119th and Suriname ranks 118th of 167 countries.

Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Indonesia Suriname Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0002 t per person 0.0004 t per person 0.0002 t per person Suriname
1970s 0.0002 t per person 0.0004 t per person 0.0002 t per person Suriname
1980s 0.0002 t per person 0.0005 t per person 0.0003 t per person Suriname
1990s 0.0002 t per person 0.0007 t per person 0.0005 t per person Suriname
2000s 0.0002 t per person 0.0005 t per person 0.0002 t per person Suriname
2010s 0.0003 t per person 0.0004 t per person 0.0002 t per person Suriname
2020s 0.0003 t per person 0.0004 t per person 0.0001 t per person Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Indonesia or Suriname?
Suriname, at 0.0003 t per person against 0.0003 t per person in Indonesia as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Indonesia and Suriname?
0 t per person, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Suriname?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Indonesia and Suriname rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Indonesia ranks 119th and Suriname ranks 118th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Indonesia vs Suriname: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-capita/indonesia/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-capita/indonesia/suriname/">Indonesia vs Suriname: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita
Unit
t per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,536 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.