Hungary vs North Macedonia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Hungary
0.0002 t per person
in 2017
North Macedonia
0.0002 t per person
in 2024
Hungary rank
133rd
North Macedonia rank
132nd

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Hungary
  • North Macedonia
00.0010.0010.002196119922024

How they compare

North Macedonia currently reports 0.0002 t per person against 0.0002 t per person in Hungary, a difference of 0 t per person.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Hungary ahead.

Hungary ranks 133rd and North Macedonia ranks 132nd of 167 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Hungary averaged higher in 1 and North Macedonia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hungary North Macedonia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0004 t per person 0.0003 t per person 0.0001 t per person Hungary
2000s 0.0003 t per person 0.0003 t per person 0.0001 t per person North Macedonia
2010s 0.0002 t per person 0.0002 t per person 0.0001 t per person North Macedonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Hungary or North Macedonia?
North Macedonia, at 0.0002 t per person against 0.0002 t per person in Hungary as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Hungary and North Macedonia?
0 t per person, with North Macedonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and North Macedonia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.
How do Hungary and North Macedonia rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Hungary ranks 133rd and North Macedonia ranks 132nd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hungary vs North Macedonia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-capita/hungary/north-macedonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-capita/hungary/north-macedonia/">Hungary vs North Macedonia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita
Unit
t per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,536 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.