Haiti vs Sweden: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Haiti
0.0008 t per person
in 2024
Sweden
0.0007 t per person
in 2017
Haiti rank
81st
Sweden rank
83rd

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Haiti
  • Sweden
00.0010.0010.002196119922024

How they compare

Haiti currently reports 0.0008 t per person against 0.0007 t per person in Sweden, a difference of 0.0001 t per person.

That makes Haiti's figure about 1.1 times Sweden's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sweden ahead.

Haiti ranks 81st and Sweden ranks 83rd of 167 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Haiti averaged higher in 2 and Sweden in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Haiti Sweden Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0007 t per person 0.0012 t per person 0.0005 t per person Sweden
1970s 0.0007 t per person 0.0011 t per person 0.0004 t per person Sweden
1980s 0.0008 t per person 0.001 t per person 0.0001 t per person Sweden
1990s 0.0007 t per person 0.0009 t per person 0.0002 t per person Sweden
2000s 0.0008 t per person 0.0008 t per person 0 t per person Haiti
2010s 0.0008 t per person 0.0007 t per person 0.0001 t per person Haiti

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Haiti or Sweden?
Haiti, at 0.0008 t per person against 0.0007 t per person in Sweden as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Haiti and Sweden?
0.0001 t per person, with Haiti ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Haiti and Sweden?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Haiti and Sweden rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Haiti ranks 81st and Sweden ranks 83rd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Haiti vs Sweden: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-capita/haiti/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-capita/haiti/sweden/">Haiti vs Sweden: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita
Unit
t per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,536 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.