Guinea vs Norway: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Guinea
0.0009 t per person
in 2024
Norway
0.0009 t per person
in 2024
Guinea rank
71st
Norway rank
72nd

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Guinea
  • Norway
0.0010.0010.002196119922024

How they compare

Guinea currently reports 0.0009 t per person against 0.0009 t per person in Norway, a difference of 0 t per person.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Norway ahead.

Guinea ranks 71st and Norway ranks 72nd of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Norway in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea Norway Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0005 t per person 0.0012 t per person 0.0006 t per person Norway
1970s 0.0005 t per person 0.0013 t per person 0.0008 t per person Norway
1980s 0.0004 t per person 0.0011 t per person 0.0007 t per person Norway
1990s 0.0006 t per person 0.0012 t per person 0.0006 t per person Norway
2000s 0.0008 t per person 0.0011 t per person 0.0003 t per person Norway
2010s 0.0013 t per person 0.001 t per person 0.0003 t per person Guinea
2020s 0.001 t per person 0.001 t per person 0 t per person Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Guinea or Norway?
Guinea, at 0.0009 t per person against 0.0009 t per person in Norway as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Guinea and Norway?
0 t per person, with Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Norway?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Guinea and Norway rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Guinea ranks 71st and Norway ranks 72nd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea vs Norway: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-capita/guinea/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-capita/guinea/norway/">Guinea vs Norway: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita
Unit
t per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,536 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.