Estonia vs Serbia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per
Estonia
0.0017 t per person
in 2017
Serbia
0.0018 t per person
in 2024
Estonia rank
44th
Serbia rank
42nd
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time
- Estonia
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 0.0018 t per person against 0.0017 t per person in Estonia, a difference of 0.0001 t per person.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 44th and Serbia ranks 42nd of 167 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0021 t per person | 0.002 t per person | 0.0001 t per person | Estonia |
| 2010s | 0.0018 t per person | 0.0016 t per person | 0.0002 t per person | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Estonia or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 0.0018 t per person against 0.0017 t per person in Estonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Estonia and Serbia?
- 0.0001 t per person, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Serbia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2017.
- How do Estonia and Serbia rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
- Estonia ranks 44th and Serbia ranks 42nd of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.