Estonia vs Montenegro: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per
Estonia
0.0017 t per person
in 2017
Montenegro
0.0017 t per person
in 2024
Estonia rank
44th
Montenegro rank
47th
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time
- Estonia
- Montenegro
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 0.0017 t per person against 0.0017 t per person in Montenegro, a difference of 0 t per person.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Estonia has been ahead every year.
Estonia ranks 44th and Montenegro ranks 47th of 167 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0021 t per person | 0.0012 t per person | 0.0009 t per person | Estonia |
| 2010s | 0.0018 t per person | 0.0011 t per person | 0.0007 t per person | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Estonia or Montenegro?
- Estonia, at 0.0017 t per person against 0.0017 t per person in Montenegro as of 2017.
- What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Estonia and Montenegro?
- 0 t per person, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Montenegro?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2017.
- How do Estonia and Montenegro rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
- Estonia ranks 44th and Montenegro ranks 47th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.