Eritrea vs New Caledonia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Eritrea
0.0015 t per person
in 2024
New Caledonia
0.0014 t per person
in 2024
Eritrea rank
50th
New Caledonia rank
53rd

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Eritrea
  • New Caledonia
0.0010.0020.0030.0040.005196119922024

How they compare

Eritrea currently reports 0.0015 t per person against 0.0014 t per person in New Caledonia, a difference of 0.0001 t per person.

That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.1 times New Caledonia's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1993 it was New Caledonia ahead.

Eritrea ranks 50th and New Caledonia ranks 53rd of 167 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 1 and New Caledonia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eritrea New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0012 t per person 0.0027 t per person 0.0014 t per person New Caledonia
2000s 0.0014 t per person 0.002 t per person 0.0006 t per person New Caledonia
2010s 0.0015 t per person 0.0016 t per person 0.0001 t per person New Caledonia
2020s 0.0015 t per person 0.0014 t per person 0.0001 t per person Eritrea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Eritrea or New Caledonia?
Eritrea, at 0.0015 t per person against 0.0014 t per person in New Caledonia as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Eritrea and New Caledonia?
0.0001 t per person, with Eritrea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and New Caledonia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
How do Eritrea and New Caledonia rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Eritrea ranks 50th and New Caledonia ranks 53rd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eritrea vs New Caledonia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-capita/eritrea/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-capita/eritrea/new-caledonia/">Eritrea vs New Caledonia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita
Unit
t per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,536 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.