How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Haiti?

64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Dominican Republic vs Haiti: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Dominican Republic

0.0009 t per person

in 2024

Haiti

0.0008 t per person

in 2024

Dominican Republic rank

78th

Haiti rank

81st

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

Dominican Republic
Haiti

How they compare

Dominican Republic currently reports 0.0009 t per person against 0.0008 t per person in Haiti, a difference of 0.0001 t per person.

That makes Dominican Republic's figure about 1.1 times Haiti's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Dominican Republic ahead.

Dominican Republic ranks 78th and Haiti ranks 81st of 167 countries.

Dominican Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Dominican Republic	Haiti	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.001 t per person	0.0007 t per person	0.0003 t per person	Dominican Republic
1970s	0.0011 t per person	0.0007 t per person	0.0004 t per person	Dominican Republic
1980s	0.0014 t per person	0.0008 t per person	0.0006 t per person	Dominican Republic
1990s	0.0012 t per person	0.0007 t per person	0.0006 t per person	Dominican Republic
2000s	0.0013 t per person	0.0008 t per person	0.0004 t per person	Dominican Republic
2010s	0.0012 t per person	0.0008 t per person	0.0004 t per person	Dominican Republic
2020s	0.0008 t per person	0.0008 t per person	0.0001 t per person	Dominican Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Dominican Republic or Haiti?: Dominican Republic, at 0.0009 t per person against 0.0008 t per person in Haiti as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Dominican Republic and Haiti?: 0.0001 t per person, with Dominican Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Haiti?: 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Dominican Republic and Haiti rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?: Dominican Republic ranks 78th and Haiti ranks 81st of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dominican Republic vs Haiti: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-capita/dominican-republic/haiti/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-capita/dominican-republic/haiti/">Dominican Republic vs Haiti: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita
Unit: t per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 168 places, 9,536 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 22 September 2026

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.