Czechia vs Jordan: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per
Czechia
0.0009 t per person
in 2017
Jordan
0.0009 t per person
in 2024
Czechia rank
73rd
Jordan rank
75th
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time
- Czechia
- Jordan
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 0.0009 t per person against 0.0009 t per person in Jordan, a difference of 0 t per person.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Czechia has been ahead every year.
Czechia ranks 73rd and Jordan ranks 75th of 167 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0022 t per person | 0.0002 t per person | 0.0021 t per person | Czechia |
| 2000s | 0.0013 t per person | 0.0004 t per person | 0.0009 t per person | Czechia |
| 2010s | 0.0009 t per person | 0.0005 t per person | 0.0004 t per person | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Czechia or Jordan?
- Czechia, at 0.0009 t per person against 0.0009 t per person in Jordan as of 2017.
- What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Czechia and Jordan?
- 0 t per person, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Jordan?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2017.
- How do Czechia and Jordan rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
- Czechia ranks 73rd and Jordan ranks 75th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.