How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Sudan?

13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chile vs Sudan: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Chile

0.0012 t per person

in 2024

Sudan

0.0012 t per person

in 2024

Chile rank

58th

Sudan rank

61st

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

Chile
Sudan

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0.0012 t per person against 0.0012 t per person in Sudan, a difference of 0 t per person.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.

Chile ranks 58th and Sudan ranks 61st of 167 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chile	Sudan	Difference	Ahead
2010s	0.0014 t per person	0.0015 t per person	0.0001 t per person	Sudan
2020s	0.0013 t per person	0.0013 t per person	0 t per person	Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Chile or Sudan?: Chile, at 0.0012 t per person against 0.0012 t per person in Sudan as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Chile and Sudan?: 0 t per person, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Sudan?: 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
How do Chile and Sudan rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?: Chile ranks 58th and Sudan ranks 61st of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Sudan: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-capita/chile/sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-capita/chile/sudan/">Chile vs Sudan: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita
Unit: t per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 168 places, 9,536 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 22 September 2026

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.