Chile vs Finland: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Chile
0.0012 t per person
in 2024
Finland
0.0012 t per person
in 2017
Chile rank
58th
Finland rank
59th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Chile
  • Finland
0.0010.0020.0020.0030.0030.004196119922024

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0.0012 t per person against 0.0012 t per person in Finland, a difference of 0 t per person.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 58th and Finland ranks 59th of 167 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 3 and Finland in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Finland Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0021 t per person 0.0026 t per person 0.0005 t per person Finland
1970s 0.0019 t per person 0.0031 t per person 0.0012 t per person Finland
1980s 0.0019 t per person 0.0029 t per person 0.001 t per person Finland
1990s 0.0021 t per person 0.0016 t per person 0.0004 t per person Chile
2000s 0.0017 t per person 0.0013 t per person 0.0003 t per person Chile
2010s 0.0015 t per person 0.0012 t per person 0.0002 t per person Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Chile or Finland?
Chile, at 0.0012 t per person against 0.0012 t per person in Finland as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Chile and Finland?
0 t per person, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Finland?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Chile and Finland rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Chile ranks 58th and Finland ranks 59th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Finland: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-capita/chile/finland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-capita/chile/finland/">Chile vs Finland: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita
Unit
t per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,536 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.