Burundi vs North Macedonia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Burundi
0.0002 t per person
in 2024
North Macedonia
0.0002 t per person
in 2024
Burundi rank
131st
North Macedonia rank
132nd

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Burundi
  • North Macedonia
00000.001196119922024

How they compare

Burundi currently reports 0.0002 t per person against 0.0002 t per person in North Macedonia, a difference of 0 t per person.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was North Macedonia ahead.

Burundi ranks 131st and North Macedonia ranks 132nd of 167 countries.

North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi North Macedonia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0002 t per person 0.0003 t per person 0.0001 t per person North Macedonia
2000s 0.0002 t per person 0.0003 t per person 0.0001 t per person North Macedonia
2010s 0.0002 t per person 0.0002 t per person 0.0001 t per person North Macedonia
2020s 0.0002 t per person 0.0002 t per person 0 t per person North Macedonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Burundi or North Macedonia?
Burundi, at 0.0002 t per person against 0.0002 t per person in North Macedonia as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Burundi and North Macedonia?
0 t per person, with Burundi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and North Macedonia?
33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
How do Burundi and North Macedonia rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Burundi ranks 131st and North Macedonia ranks 132nd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burundi vs North Macedonia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-capita/burundi/north-macedonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-capita/burundi/north-macedonia/">Burundi vs North Macedonia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita
Unit
t per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,536 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.