Bangladesh vs Malta: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Bangladesh
0.0002 t per person
in 2024
Malta
0.0002 t per person
in 2017
Bangladesh rank
128th
Malta rank
127th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Malta
000.0010.0010.001196119922024

How they compare

Malta currently reports 0.0002 t per person against 0.0002 t per person in Bangladesh, a difference of 0 t per person.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malta ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 128th and Malta ranks 127th of 167 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Malta Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0004 t per person 0.0008 t per person 0.0004 t per person Malta
1970s 0.0004 t per person 0.0007 t per person 0.0003 t per person Malta
1980s 0.0003 t per person 0.0005 t per person 0.0003 t per person Malta
1990s 0.0002 t per person 0.0004 t per person 0.0002 t per person Malta
2000s 0.0003 t per person 0.0004 t per person 0.0001 t per person Malta
2010s 0.0002 t per person 0.0003 t per person 0 t per person Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Bangladesh or Malta?
Malta, at 0.0002 t per person against 0.0002 t per person in Bangladesh as of 2017.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Bangladesh and Malta?
0 t per person, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Malta?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Bangladesh and Malta rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Bangladesh ranks 128th and Malta ranks 127th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Malta: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-capita/bangladesh/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-capita/bangladesh/malta/">Bangladesh vs Malta: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita
Unit
t per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,536 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.