Bahamas vs Papua New Guinea: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Bahamas
0 t per person
in 2024
Papua New Guinea
0 t per person
in 2024
Bahamas rank
165th
Papua New Guinea rank
162nd

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Bahamas
  • Papua New Guinea
00000196119922024

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 0 t per person against 0 t per person in Bahamas, a difference of 0 t per person.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 4.3 times Bahamas's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bahamas ahead.

Bahamas ranks 165th and Papua New Guinea ranks 162nd of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 1 and Papua New Guinea in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0002 t per person 0.0001 t per person 0.0001 t per person Bahamas
1970s 0.0001 t per person 0.0001 t per person 0.0001 t per person Papua New Guinea
1980s 0 t per person 0.0001 t per person 0.0001 t per person Papua New Guinea
1990s 0 t per person 0.0001 t per person 0.0001 t per person Papua New Guinea
2000s 0 t per person 0.0001 t per person 0.0001 t per person Papua New Guinea
2010s 0 t per person 0.0001 t per person 0 t per person Papua New Guinea
2020s 0 t per person 0 t per person 0 t per person Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Bahamas or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at 0 t per person against 0 t per person in Bahamas as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Bahamas and Papua New Guinea?
0 t per person, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Papua New Guinea?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Bahamas and Papua New Guinea rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Bahamas ranks 165th and Papua New Guinea ranks 162nd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Papua New Guinea: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-capita/bahamas-the/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-capita/bahamas-the/papua-new-guinea/">Bahamas vs Papua New Guinea: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita
Unit
t per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,536 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.