Austria vs Panama: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Austria
0.0023 t per person
in 2017
Panama
0.0022 t per person
in 2024
Austria rank
31st
Panama rank
33rd

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Austria
  • Panama
0.0010.0020.0030.004196119922024

How they compare

Austria currently reports 0.0023 t per person against 0.0022 t per person in Panama, a difference of 0.0001 t per person.

That makes Austria's figure about 1.1 times Panama's.

Across all 57 years both countries report, Panama has been ahead every year.

Austria ranks 31st and Panama ranks 33rd of 167 countries.

Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria Panama Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0011 t per person 0.0026 t per person 0.0015 t per person Panama
1970s 0.0013 t per person 0.003 t per person 0.0018 t per person Panama
1980s 0.0017 t per person 0.0031 t per person 0.0015 t per person Panama
1990s 0.0024 t per person 0.0033 t per person 0.0009 t per person Panama
2000s 0.0024 t per person 0.0028 t per person 0.0005 t per person Panama
2010s 0.0024 t per person 0.0029 t per person 0.0005 t per person Panama

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Austria or Panama?
Austria, at 0.0023 t per person against 0.0022 t per person in Panama as of 2017.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Austria and Panama?
0.0001 t per person, with Austria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Panama?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Austria and Panama rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Austria ranks 31st and Panama ranks 33rd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs Panama: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-capita/austria/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-capita/austria/panama/">Austria vs Panama: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita
Unit
t per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,536 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.