Angola vs Palestine: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Angola
0.0005 t per person
in 2024
Palestine
0.0004 t per person
in 2022
Angola rank
106th
Palestine rank
109th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Angola
  • Palestine
00.0010.0010.0010.001196119922024

How they compare

Angola currently reports 0.0005 t per person against 0.0004 t per person in Palestine, a difference of 0.0001 t per person.

That makes Angola's figure about 1.1 times Palestine's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Angola ahead.

Angola ranks 106th and Palestine ranks 109th of 167 countries.

Angola has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Palestine Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0008 t per person 0.0007 t per person 0.0001 t per person Angola
2000s 0.0008 t per person 0.0003 t per person 0.0004 t per person Angola
2010s 0.0006 t per person 0.0003 t per person 0.0003 t per person Angola
2020s 0.0005 t per person 0.0004 t per person 0 t per person Angola

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Angola or Palestine?
Angola, at 0.0005 t per person against 0.0004 t per person in Palestine as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Angola and Palestine?
0.0001 t per person, with Angola ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Palestine?
29 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2022.
How do Angola and Palestine rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Angola ranks 106th and Palestine ranks 109th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Palestine: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-capita/angola/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-capita/angola/west-bank-and-gaza/">Angola vs Palestine: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita
Unit
t per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,536 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.