Rwanda vs Sao Tome and Principe: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual

Rwanda
7.31 % change on previous year
in 2024
Sao Tome and Principe
7.38 % change on previous year
in 2024
Rwanda rank
28th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
27th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual over time

  • Rwanda
  • Sao Tome and Principe
-50050100150196219932024

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 7.38 % change on previous year against 7.31 % change on previous year in Rwanda, a difference of 0.07 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 34 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Rwanda ranks 28th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 27th of 209 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 3 and Sao Tome and Principe in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 6.17 % change on previous year 14.97 % change on previous year 8.81 % change on previous year Sao Tome and Principe
1970s 6.35 % change on previous year -5.96 % change on previous year 12.32 % change on previous year Rwanda
1980s 2.17 % change on previous year 3.94 % change on previous year 1.77 % change on previous year Sao Tome and Principe
1990s 2.94 % change on previous year 1.85 % change on previous year 1.09 % change on previous year Rwanda
2000s 7.57 % change on previous year 2.36 % change on previous year 5.21 % change on previous year Rwanda
2010s 0.7568 % change on previous year 5.8 % change on previous year 5.05 % change on previous year Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 3.52 % change on previous year 14.12 % change on previous year 10.59 % change on previous year Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual, Rwanda or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 7.38 % change on previous year against 7.31 % change on previous year in Rwanda as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual between Rwanda and Sao Tome and Principe?
0.07 % change on previous year, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Sao Tome and Principe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do Rwanda and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual?
Rwanda ranks 28th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 27th of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Sao Tome and Principe: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-annual-growth-rate/rwanda/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-annual-growth-rate/rwanda/sao-tome-and-principe/">Rwanda vs Sao Tome and Principe: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
239 places, 13,385 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.