Portugal vs Solomon Islands: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual

Portugal
0.5324 % change on previous year
in 2017
Solomon Islands
0.3984 % change on previous year
in 2024
Portugal rank
95th
Solomon Islands rank
98th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual over time

  • Portugal
  • Solomon Islands
-50050100196219932024

How they compare

Portugal currently reports 0.5324 % change on previous year against 0.3984 % change on previous year in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0.134 % change on previous year.

That makes Portugal's figure about 1.3 times Solomon Islands's.

The two have swapped places 32 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Portugal ahead.

Portugal ranks 95th and Solomon Islands ranks 98th of 209 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Portugal averaged higher in 1 and Solomon Islands in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Portugal Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 9.31 % change on previous year 13.4 % change on previous year 4.09 % change on previous year Solomon Islands
1970s 2.07 % change on previous year 10.48 % change on previous year 8.41 % change on previous year Solomon Islands
1980s 3.31 % change on previous year 1.67 % change on previous year 1.63 % change on previous year Portugal
1990s -2.28 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 2.28 % change on previous year Solomon Islands
2000s 0.9453 % change on previous year 2.01 % change on previous year 1.06 % change on previous year Solomon Islands
2010s -1.3 % change on previous year 0.2238 % change on previous year 1.52 % change on previous year Solomon Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual, Portugal or Solomon Islands?
Portugal, at 0.5324 % change on previous year against 0.3984 % change on previous year in Solomon Islands as of 2017.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual between Portugal and Solomon Islands?
0.134 % change on previous year, with Portugal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Portugal and Solomon Islands?
56 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2017.
How do Portugal and Solomon Islands rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual?
Portugal ranks 95th and Solomon Islands ranks 98th of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Portugal vs Solomon Islands: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-annual-growth-rate/portugal/solomon-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-annual-growth-rate/portugal/solomon-islands/">Portugal vs Solomon Islands: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
239 places, 13,385 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.