Poland vs South-eastern Asia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual

Poland
11.17 % change on previous year
in 2017
South-eastern Asia
1.7 % change on previous year
in 2024
Poland rank
18th
South-eastern Asia rank
21st

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual over time

  • Poland
  • South-eastern Asia
-20-100102030196219932024

How they compare

Poland currently reports 11.17 % change on previous year against 1.7 % change on previous year in South-eastern Asia, a difference of 9.47 % change on previous year.

That makes Poland's figure about 6.6 times South-eastern Asia's.

The two have swapped places 20 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Poland ahead.

Poland ranks 18th and South-eastern Asia ranks 21st of 209 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Poland averaged higher in 2 and South-eastern Asia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Poland South-eastern Asia Difference Ahead
1960s 5.55 % change on previous year 2.82 % change on previous year 2.73 % change on previous year Poland
1970s 1.46 % change on previous year 4.03 % change on previous year 2.58 % change on previous year South-eastern Asia
1980s -0.5484 % change on previous year 2.03 % change on previous year 2.58 % change on previous year South-eastern Asia
1990s -4.16 % change on previous year 2.17 % change on previous year 6.34 % change on previous year South-eastern Asia
2000s 0.7026 % change on previous year 4.2 % change on previous year 3.5 % change on previous year South-eastern Asia
2010s 4.86 % change on previous year 3.14 % change on previous year 1.72 % change on previous year Poland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual, Poland or South-eastern Asia?
Poland, at 11.17 % change on previous year against 1.7 % change on previous year in South-eastern Asia as of 2017.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual between Poland and South-eastern Asia?
9.47 % change on previous year, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and South-eastern Asia?
56 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2017.
How do Poland and South-eastern Asia rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual?
Poland ranks 18th and South-eastern Asia ranks 21st of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Poland vs South-eastern Asia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-annual-growth-rate/poland/south-eastern-asia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-annual-growth-rate/poland/south-eastern-asia/">Poland vs South-eastern Asia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
239 places, 13,385 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.