Norway vs Romania: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual

Norway
-4.93 % change on previous year
in 2024
Romania
-4.46 % change on previous year
in 2017
Norway rank
166th
Romania rank
163rd

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual over time

  • Norway
  • Romania
-20020406080196219932024

How they compare

Romania currently reports -4.46 % change on previous year against -4.93 % change on previous year in Norway, a difference of 0.47 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 35 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Romania ahead.

Norway ranks 166th and Romania ranks 163rd of 209 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Norway averaged higher in 4 and Romania in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Norway Romania Difference Ahead
1960s 9.78 % change on previous year 5.14 % change on previous year 4.64 % change on previous year Norway
1970s -0.7292 % change on previous year 3.85 % change on previous year 4.58 % change on previous year Romania
1980s -0.9147 % change on previous year -3.09 % change on previous year 2.18 % change on previous year Norway
1990s 2.32 % change on previous year -2.01 % change on previous year 4.33 % change on previous year Norway
2000s -1.13 % change on previous year 0.8434 % change on previous year 1.98 % change on previous year Romania
2010s 0.1486 % change on previous year -3.53 % change on previous year 3.68 % change on previous year Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual, Norway or Romania?
Romania, at -4.46 % change on previous year against -4.93 % change on previous year in Norway as of 2017.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual between Norway and Romania?
0.47 % change on previous year, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Romania?
56 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2017.
How do Norway and Romania rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual?
Norway ranks 166th and Romania ranks 163rd of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Norway vs Romania: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-annual-growth-rate/norway/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-annual-growth-rate/norway/romania/">Norway vs Romania: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
239 places, 13,385 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.