Micronesia vs Somalia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual

Micronesia
0.0503 % change on previous year
in 2024
Somalia
0.0811 % change on previous year
in 2024
Micronesia rank
106th
Somalia rank
104th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual over time

  • Micronesia
  • Somalia
-50050100196219932024

How they compare

Somalia currently reports 0.0811 % change on previous year against 0.0503 % change on previous year in Micronesia, a difference of 0.0308 % change on previous year.

That makes Somalia's figure about 1.6 times Micronesia's.

The two have swapped places 17 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Micronesia ahead.

Micronesia ranks 106th and Somalia ranks 104th of 209 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Micronesia averaged higher in 1 and Somalia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Micronesia Somalia Difference Ahead
1990s -0.0548 % change on previous year 4.96 % change on previous year 5.02 % change on previous year Somalia
2000s -0.0947 % change on previous year 0.0925 % change on previous year 0.1872 % change on previous year Somalia
2010s 0.0914 % change on previous year -0.3934 % change on previous year 0.4848 % change on previous year Micronesia
2020s 0.7727 % change on previous year 9.52 % change on previous year 8.74 % change on previous year Somalia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual, Micronesia or Somalia?
Somalia, at 0.0811 % change on previous year against 0.0503 % change on previous year in Micronesia as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual between Micronesia and Somalia?
0.0308 % change on previous year, with Somalia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia and Somalia?
33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
How do Micronesia and Somalia rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual?
Micronesia ranks 106th and Somalia ranks 104th of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Micronesia vs Somalia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-annual-growth-rate/micronesia/somalia-fed-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-annual-growth-rate/micronesia/somalia-fed-rep/">Micronesia vs Somalia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
239 places, 13,385 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.