Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Turkmenistan: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
3.01 % change on previous year
in 2024
Turkmenistan
11.81 % change on previous year
in 2024
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
14th
Turkmenistan rank
16th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Turkmenistan
010203040196219932024

How they compare

Turkmenistan currently reports 11.81 % change on previous year against 3.01 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 8.8 % change on previous year.

That makes Turkmenistan's figure about 3.9 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Turkmenistan ahead.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 14th and Turkmenistan ranks 16th of 30 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) averaged higher in 1 and Turkmenistan in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Turkmenistan Difference Ahead
1990s 3.93 % change on previous year 4.66 % change on previous year 0.7348 % change on previous year Turkmenistan
2000s 2.48 % change on previous year 8.8 % change on previous year 6.32 % change on previous year Turkmenistan
2010s 2.79 % change on previous year 2.28 % change on previous year 0.5069 % change on previous year Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 1.92 % change on previous year 3.77 % change on previous year 1.85 % change on previous year Turkmenistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Turkmenistan?
Turkmenistan, at 11.81 % change on previous year against 3.01 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Turkmenistan?
8.8 % change on previous year, with Turkmenistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Turkmenistan?
32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Turkmenistan rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 14th and Turkmenistan ranks 16th of 30 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Turkmenistan: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-annual-growth-rate/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/turkmenistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-annual-growth-rate/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/turkmenistan/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Turkmenistan: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
239 places, 13,385 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.