Lebanon vs New Zealand: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual

Lebanon
-0.1529 % change on previous year
in 2024
New Zealand
-0.3231 % change on previous year
in 2024
Lebanon rank
112th
New Zealand rank
115th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual over time

  • Lebanon
  • New Zealand
0200400600800196219932024

How they compare

Lebanon currently reports -0.1529 % change on previous year against -0.3231 % change on previous year in New Zealand, a difference of 0.1702 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 30 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Lebanon ahead.

Lebanon ranks 112th and New Zealand ranks 115th of 209 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Lebanon averaged higher in 4 and New Zealand in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lebanon New Zealand Difference Ahead
1960s 2.07 % change on previous year 6.04 % change on previous year 3.97 % change on previous year New Zealand
1970s 68.27 % change on previous year 3.96 % change on previous year 64.31 % change on previous year Lebanon
1980s 3.51 % change on previous year 1.22 % change on previous year 2.29 % change on previous year Lebanon
1990s 51.7 % change on previous year 0.319 % change on previous year 51.38 % change on previous year Lebanon
2000s 3.32 % change on previous year 1.57 % change on previous year 1.74 % change on previous year Lebanon
2010s -1.81 % change on previous year 1.2 % change on previous year 3.01 % change on previous year New Zealand
2020s -4.06 % change on previous year 0.8489 % change on previous year 4.91 % change on previous year New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual, Lebanon or New Zealand?
Lebanon, at -0.1529 % change on previous year against -0.3231 % change on previous year in New Zealand as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual between Lebanon and New Zealand?
0.1702 % change on previous year, with Lebanon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and New Zealand?
63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do Lebanon and New Zealand rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual?
Lebanon ranks 112th and New Zealand ranks 115th of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lebanon vs New Zealand: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-annual-growth-rate/lebanon/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-annual-growth-rate/lebanon/new-zealand/">Lebanon vs New Zealand: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
239 places, 13,385 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.