Latvia vs Melanesia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual

Latvia
-5.23 % change on previous year
in 2017
Melanesia
-5.03 % change on previous year
in 2024
Latvia rank
171st
Melanesia rank
168th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual over time

  • Latvia
  • Melanesia
-40-2002040196219932024

How they compare

Melanesia currently reports -5.03 % change on previous year against -5.23 % change on previous year in Latvia, a difference of 0.2 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 25 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Melanesia ahead.

Latvia ranks 171st and Melanesia ranks 168th of 209 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Melanesia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Melanesia Difference Ahead
1990s -19.5 % change on previous year 2.52 % change on previous year 22.02 % change on previous year Melanesia
2000s -0.1846 % change on previous year -1.99 % change on previous year 1.8 % change on previous year Latvia
2010s -1.13 % change on previous year 1.63 % change on previous year 2.76 % change on previous year Melanesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual, Latvia or Melanesia?
Melanesia, at -5.03 % change on previous year against -5.23 % change on previous year in Latvia as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual between Latvia and Melanesia?
0.2 % change on previous year, with Melanesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Melanesia?
25 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2017.
How do Latvia and Melanesia rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual?
Latvia ranks 171st and Melanesia ranks 168th of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Melanesia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-annual-growth-rate/latvia/melanesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-annual-growth-rate/latvia/melanesia/">Latvia vs Melanesia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
239 places, 13,385 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.