Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Malaysia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual over time
- Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 10.58 % change on previous year against 1.44 % change on previous year in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), a difference of 9.14 % change on previous year.
That makes Malaysia's figure about 7.3 times Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s.
The two have swapped places 28 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Malaysia ahead.
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 22nd and Malaysia ranks 19th of 30 groups.
Across the 7 decades both report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) averaged higher in 5 and Malaysia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.2 % change on previous year | 1.52 % change on previous year | 0.6864 % change on previous year | Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) |
| 1970s | 2.6 % change on previous year | 5.21 % change on previous year | 2.61 % change on previous year | Malaysia |
| 1980s | 2.02 % change on previous year | 1.62 % change on previous year | 0.3994 % change on previous year | Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) |
| 1990s | 14.02 % change on previous year | 3.97 % change on previous year | 10.05 % change on previous year | Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) |
| 2000s | 2.28 % change on previous year | 8.58 % change on previous year | 6.3 % change on previous year | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 3.4 % change on previous year | 0.7651 % change on previous year | 2.64 % change on previous year | Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) |
| 2020s | 2.29 % change on previous year | 1.86 % change on previous year | 0.4292 % change on previous year | Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 10.58 % change on previous year against 1.44 % change on previous year in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) as of 2024.
- What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Malaysia?
- 9.14 % change on previous year, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Malaysia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
- How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Malaysia rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual?
- Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 22nd and Malaysia ranks 19th of 30 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.