French Polynesia vs Latvia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual

French Polynesia
-5.2 % change on previous year
in 2024
Latvia
-5.23 % change on previous year
in 2017
French Polynesia rank
170th
Latvia rank
171st

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual over time

  • French Polynesia
  • Latvia
-50050100196219932024

How they compare

French Polynesia currently reports -5.2 % change on previous year against -5.23 % change on previous year in Latvia, a difference of 0.03 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 25 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Latvia ahead.

French Polynesia ranks 170th and Latvia ranks 171st of 209 countries.

French Polynesia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade French Polynesia Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 6.71 % change on previous year -19.5 % change on previous year 26.21 % change on previous year French Polynesia
2000s 2.44 % change on previous year -0.1846 % change on previous year 2.63 % change on previous year French Polynesia
2010s 0.6999 % change on previous year -1.13 % change on previous year 1.83 % change on previous year French Polynesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual, French Polynesia or Latvia?
French Polynesia, at -5.2 % change on previous year against -5.23 % change on previous year in Latvia as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual between French Polynesia and Latvia?
0.03 % change on previous year, with French Polynesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Latvia?
25 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2017.
How do French Polynesia and Latvia rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual?
French Polynesia ranks 170th and Latvia ranks 171st of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

French Polynesia vs Latvia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-annual-growth-rate/french-polynesia/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-annual-growth-rate/french-polynesia/latvia/">French Polynesia vs Latvia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
239 places, 13,385 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.