French Polynesia vs Kuwait: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual

French Polynesia
-5.2 % change on previous year
in 2024
Kuwait
-4.94 % change on previous year
in 2024
French Polynesia rank
170th
Kuwait rank
167th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual over time

  • French Polynesia
  • Kuwait
-1000100200300400196219932024

How they compare

Kuwait currently reports -4.94 % change on previous year against -5.2 % change on previous year in French Polynesia, a difference of 0.26 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 28 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Kuwait ahead.

French Polynesia ranks 170th and Kuwait ranks 167th of 209 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, French Polynesia averaged higher in 2 and Kuwait in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade French Polynesia Kuwait Difference Ahead
1960s -1.43 % change on previous year 10.92 % change on previous year 12.35 % change on previous year Kuwait
1970s 5.91 % change on previous year 22.94 % change on previous year 17.03 % change on previous year Kuwait
1980s 2 % change on previous year -7.64 % change on previous year 9.63 % change on previous year French Polynesia
1990s -2.64 % change on previous year 30.27 % change on previous year 32.91 % change on previous year Kuwait
2000s 2.44 % change on previous year 23.41 % change on previous year 20.97 % change on previous year Kuwait
2010s 2.23 % change on previous year 8.96 % change on previous year 6.73 % change on previous year Kuwait
2020s -1.64 % change on previous year -7.81 % change on previous year 6.17 % change on previous year French Polynesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual, French Polynesia or Kuwait?
Kuwait, at -4.94 % change on previous year against -5.2 % change on previous year in French Polynesia as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual between French Polynesia and Kuwait?
0.26 % change on previous year, with Kuwait ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Kuwait?
63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do French Polynesia and Kuwait rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual?
French Polynesia ranks 170th and Kuwait ranks 167th of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

French Polynesia vs Kuwait: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-annual-growth-rate/french-polynesia/kuwait/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-annual-growth-rate/french-polynesia/kuwait/">French Polynesia vs Kuwait: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
239 places, 13,385 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.