Equatorial Guinea vs Slovenia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual

Equatorial Guinea
0.2278 % change on previous year
in 2024
Slovenia
0.3899 % change on previous year
in 2017
Equatorial Guinea rank
101st
Slovenia rank
99th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Slovenia
-40-2002040196219932024

How they compare

Slovenia currently reports 0.3899 % change on previous year against 0.2278 % change on previous year in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.1621 % change on previous year.

That makes Slovenia's figure about 1.7 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 25 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Slovenia ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 101st and Slovenia ranks 99th of 209 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 2 and Slovenia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Slovenia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.718 % change on previous year 0.3712 % change on previous year 0.3468 % change on previous year Equatorial Guinea
2000s 0.361 % change on previous year 0.4046 % change on previous year 0.0435 % change on previous year Slovenia
2010s 0.2793 % change on previous year 0.2766 % change on previous year 0.0028 % change on previous year Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual, Equatorial Guinea or Slovenia?
Slovenia, at 0.3899 % change on previous year against 0.2278 % change on previous year in Equatorial Guinea as of 2017.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual between Equatorial Guinea and Slovenia?
0.1621 % change on previous year, with Slovenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Slovenia?
25 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2017.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Slovenia rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 101st and Slovenia ranks 99th of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Slovenia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-annual-growth-rate/equatorial-guinea/slovenia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-annual-growth-rate/equatorial-guinea/slovenia/">Equatorial Guinea vs Slovenia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
239 places, 13,385 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.