Egypt vs Latvia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual
Egypt
-5.86 % change on previous year
in 2024
Latvia
-5.23 % change on previous year
in 2017
Egypt rank
174th
Latvia rank
171st
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual over time
- Egypt
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports -5.23 % change on previous year against -5.86 % change on previous year in Egypt, a difference of 0.63 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 25 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Egypt ahead.
Egypt ranks 174th and Latvia ranks 171st of 209 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0508 % change on previous year | -19.5 % change on previous year | 19.55 % change on previous year | Egypt |
| 2000s | 5.26 % change on previous year | -0.1846 % change on previous year | 5.45 % change on previous year | Egypt |
| 2010s | -1.54 % change on previous year | -1.13 % change on previous year | 0.4132 % change on previous year | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual, Egypt or Latvia?
- Latvia, at -5.23 % change on previous year against -5.86 % change on previous year in Egypt as of 2017.
- What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual between Egypt and Latvia?
- 0.63 % change on previous year, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Latvia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2017.
- How do Egypt and Latvia rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual?
- Egypt ranks 174th and Latvia ranks 171st of 209 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.