Ecuador vs Romania: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual

Ecuador
-4.08 % change on previous year
in 2024
Romania
-4.46 % change on previous year
in 2017
Ecuador rank
161st
Romania rank
163rd

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual over time

  • Ecuador
  • Romania
-2002040196219932024

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports -4.08 % change on previous year against -4.46 % change on previous year in Romania, a difference of 0.38 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 31 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Romania ahead.

Ecuador ranks 161st and Romania ranks 163rd of 209 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 5 and Romania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Romania Difference Ahead
1960s 4.68 % change on previous year 5.14 % change on previous year 0.4603 % change on previous year Romania
1970s 5.59 % change on previous year 3.85 % change on previous year 1.73 % change on previous year Ecuador
1980s 1.3 % change on previous year -3.09 % change on previous year 4.39 % change on previous year Ecuador
1990s 5.46 % change on previous year -2.01 % change on previous year 7.47 % change on previous year Ecuador
2000s 1.62 % change on previous year 0.8434 % change on previous year 0.7731 % change on previous year Ecuador
2010s 8.24 % change on previous year -3.53 % change on previous year 11.77 % change on previous year Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual, Ecuador or Romania?
Ecuador, at -4.08 % change on previous year against -4.46 % change on previous year in Romania as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual between Ecuador and Romania?
0.38 % change on previous year, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Romania?
56 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2017.
How do Ecuador and Romania rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual?
Ecuador ranks 161st and Romania ranks 163rd of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Romania: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-annual-growth-rate/ecuador/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-annual-growth-rate/ecuador/romania/">Ecuador vs Romania: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
239 places, 13,385 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.