Congo vs Finland: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual
Congo
-0.8448 % change on previous year
in 2024
Finland
-0.738 % change on previous year
in 2017
Congo rank
126th
Finland rank
123rd
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual over time
- Congo
- Finland
How they compare
Finland currently reports -0.738 % change on previous year against -0.8448 % change on previous year in Congo, a difference of 0.1068 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 20 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 126th and Finland ranks 123rd of 209 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 4 and Finland in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 19.53 % change on previous year | 5.37 % change on previous year | 14.16 % change on previous year | Congo |
| 1970s | 8.1 % change on previous year | 1.3 % change on previous year | 6.8 % change on previous year | Congo |
| 1980s | -4.94 % change on previous year | -3.92 % change on previous year | 1.02 % change on previous year | Finland |
| 1990s | 2 % change on previous year | -1.82 % change on previous year | 3.82 % change on previous year | Congo |
| 2000s | 14.8 % change on previous year | -0.8991 % change on previous year | 15.7 % change on previous year | Congo |
| 2010s | 0.5145 % change on previous year | 0.6194 % change on previous year | 0.1048 % change on previous year | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual, Congo or Finland?
- Finland, at -0.738 % change on previous year against -0.8448 % change on previous year in Congo as of 2017.
- What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual between Congo and Finland?
- 0.1068 % change on previous year, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Finland?
- 56 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2017.
- How do Congo and Finland rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual?
- Congo ranks 126th and Finland ranks 123rd of 209 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.